Which statement accurately describes a regular agenda in the public process?

A regular agenda in the public process is characterized by its inclusion of routine discussions that often require a vote. This feature is fundamental because it ensures transparency and accountability in governance, allowing the public to engage with the decision-making process on important topics that affect their community. Routine discussions typically involve matters that are standard practice in governance, such as approving minutes from previous meetings, adopting budgets, or making procedural decisions. The requirement for a vote emphasizes that these discussions are not merely informative but integral to the official decision-making framework.

In contrast, the other statements do not accurately reflect the purpose or nature of a regular agenda. Addressing issues privately undermines the transparency that public processes aim to achieve. An agenda that is not open to public scrutiny contradicts the principles of democracy and public participation. Lastly, while a regular agenda may contain some non-contentious items, it also includes issues that may spark debate or discussion, rather than being limited to only non-contentious topics. Therefore, the statement that accurately describes a regular agenda emphasizes the necessity of public discussions that involve votes, reinforcing the democratic process.